From 91ae2ace961f6181de8db325c7a3cfd557f7bf26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lionel GUEZ <guez@lmd.ens.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:40:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use a better defined test of `cost_function.py`
Now that we read SHPC on the command line and the SHPC are not
necessarily separated by year, we can use input other than
`$PWD/Global_1993_2020`, and we do not have to specially prepare a file
`sgemented.gt` for this test.
---
Tests/tests.json | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Tests/tests.json b/Tests/tests.json
index a79b35cd..11e2db37 100644
--- a/Tests/tests.json
+++ b/Tests/tests.json
@@ -14,12 +14,15 @@
{
"title": "Cost_functions",
"command":
- ["$src_dir/cost_function.py", "$PWD/Global_1993_2020/1993/SHPC_anti"],
+ [
+ "$src_dir/cost_function.py",
+ "$tests_old_dir/Extraction_eddies_region_2_noise/SHPC_anti"
+ ],
"env": {"PYTHONPATH": "$src_dir/Overlap:$src_dir/Common"},
"symlink":
[
- "$PWD/Global_1993_2020/Eddy_graph_anti/node_id_param.json",
- "$PWD/segmented.gt"
+ "$tests_old_dir/EGr2nd15md4/node_id_param.json",
+ "$PWD/Segments/segments.graphml"
],
"exclude_cmp": ["timings.txt"]
}
--
GitLab