From c0c1808093c421d66662eca27c4b09e596ecb77d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wolfgang Kastaun <wolfgang.kastaun@aei.mpg.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 12:10:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] formatting
---
lisainstrument/shift_inversion_numpy.py | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lisainstrument/shift_inversion_numpy.py b/lisainstrument/shift_inversion_numpy.py
index af70ce4..4bd90e9 100644
--- a/lisainstrument/shift_inversion_numpy.py
+++ b/lisainstrument/shift_inversion_numpy.py
@@ -204,7 +204,8 @@ class ShiftInverseNumpy: # pylint: disable=too-few-public-methods
Hence, :math:`f(l,d_l) = I[\delta U_k](-d_l) \approx \delta U(v_l - d_l)`.
If the iteration converges, it converges to a solution
- :math:`\delta \bar{V}_l = f(l,\delta \bar{V}_l) \approx \delta U(v_l - \delta\bar{V}_l) = \delta U(u_l - \delta\bar{V}_l)`,
+ :math:`\delta \bar{V}_l = f(l,\delta \bar{V}_l)
+ \approx \delta U(v_l - \delta\bar{V}_l) = \delta U(u_l - \delta\bar{V}_l)`,
where we used the implicit convention that :math:`u_l = v_l`.
This equation fulfilled for :math:`\delta\bar{V}_l` is indeed the one that
needs to be fulfilled for the desired quantity :math:`\delta V_l`, which
--
GitLab