Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  • Lionel GUEZ's avatar
    43d2eff6
    Do not use a second, 0-based, date index · 43d2eff6
    Lionel GUEZ authored
    We are reverting commit e48b7f7e. I think I did not really appreciate
    then that the number of days since 1950-1-1 is another date index. It
    is clearer to use just one date index, which is in the dbf files. So,
    in effect, we replace everywhere the old 0-based date index k by `k -
    d_init`. Note that we no longer need argument `d_init` for procedure
    `dispatch_snapshot` and we no longer need to write `d_init` to file
    `node_id_param.json`. Note also that the value of every node index
    changes by the amount `d_init * e_overestim`.
    43d2eff6
    History
    Do not use a second, 0-based, date index
    Lionel GUEZ authored
    We are reverting commit e48b7f7e. I think I did not really appreciate
    then that the number of days since 1950-1-1 is another date index. It
    is clearer to use just one date index, which is in the dbf files. So,
    in effect, we replace everywhere the old 0-based date index k by `k -
    d_init`. Note that we no longer need argument `d_init` for procedure
    `dispatch_snapshot` and we no longer need to write `d_init` to file
    `node_id_param.json`. Note also that the value of every node index
    changes by the amount `d_init * e_overestim`.