Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
SARAH SARAH
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
Collapse sidebar
  • GOODSELL Mark
  • SARAHSARAH
  • Wiki
  • Supported_gauge_sectors

Last edited by Martin Gabelmann Jun 28, 2019
Page history

Supported_gauge_sectors

Supported gauge sectors

Gauge groups

The gauge sector of a SUSY model in SARAH is fixed by defining a set of vector superfields. SARAH is not restricted to three vector superfields like in the MSSM, but many more gauge groups can be defined. To improve the power in dealing with gauge groups, SARAH has linked routines from the Mathematica package Susyno. SARAH together with Susyno take care of all group-theoretical calculations: the Dynkin and Casimir invariants are calculated, and the needed representation matrices as well as Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are derived. This is not only done forU(1) andS**U(N) gauge groups, but alsoS**O(N),S**p(2N) and expectational groups can be used. For all Abelian groups also a GUT normalization can be given. This factor comes usually from considerations about the embedding of a model in a greater symmetry group likeS**U(5) orS**O(10). If a GUT normalization is defined for a group, it will be used in the calculation of the RGEs. The soft-breaking terms for a gauginoλ of a gauge groupA are usually included as

\mathfrak{L}_{SB,\lambda_A} = \frac{1}{2} \lambda_A^a \lambda_A^a M_A + h.c.

Gauge interactions

With the definition of the vector superfields already the self-interactions of vector bosons as well as the interactions between vector bosons and gauginos are fixed. Those are taken to be

\mathfrak{L}= - \frac{1}{4} F^{A,a}_{\mu\nu} F^{A,\mu\nu a} - i \lambda_A^{\dagger a } \bar{\sigma}^\mu D_\mu \lambda_A^a

I’m using here and in the following capital lettersA, B to label the gauge groups and small lettera, b, c to label the generators, vector bosons and gauginos of a particular gauge group. The field strength tensor is defined as

Fμ**νA, a = ∂μVνA, a − ∂νVμA, a + gAfAabcVμA, bVνA, c,

and the covariant derivative is

DμλAa = ∂μλAa + gAfabcAμbλc.

Here,fAabc is the structure constant of the gauge groupA. Plugging eq. ([eq:FieldStrength]) in the first term of eq. ([eq:LagVS]) leads to self-interactions of three and four gauge bosons. In general, the procedure to obtain the Lagrangian from the vector and chiral superfields is very similar to Ref. . Interested readers might check this reference for more details.

Gauge interactions of matter fields

Vector superfields usually don’t come alone but also matter fields are present. This is discussed below. Here, it is assumed that a number of chiral superfields are present and we want to discuss the gauge interactions which are taken into account for those. First, theD-terms stemming from the auxiliary component of the superfield are calculated. These terms cause four scalar interactions and read

\mathfrak{L}_{D_A} = \frac{1}{2} g^2_A \sum_{i,j} |(\phi_i^\* T_{A r}^a \phi_j)|^2

Here, the sum is over all scalarsi, j in the model,TA**ra are the generators of the gauge groupA for a irreducible representationr. For Abelian groupsTA**ra simplify to the chargesQϕA of the different fields. In addition, Abelian gauge groups can come also with another feature: a Fayet-IliopoulosD-term :

\mathfrak{L}{FI,A} = \xi_A \frac{g_A}{2} \sum{i} (\phi_i^* Q^A_\phi \phi_i)

This term can optionally be included in SARAH for anyU(1). The other gauge–matter interactions are those stemming from the kinetic terms:

\mathfrak{L}{kin} = - D^\mu \phi^{*i} D\mu \phi_i - i \psi^{\dagger i } \bar{\sigma}^\mu D_\mu \psi_i

with covariant derivativesDμ ≡ ∂μ − i**gAVμA, a(TA**ra). The SUSY counterparts of these interactions are those between gauginos and matter fermions and scalars:

\mathfrak{L}_{GFS} = - \sqrt{2} g_A (\phi_i^\* T_{Ar}^a \psi_j) \lambda_A^a + \mbox{h.c.} .

Gauge kinetic mixing

The terms mentioned so far cover all gauge interactions which are possible in the MSSM. These are derived for any other SUSY model in exactly the same way. However, there is another subtlety which arises if more than one Abelian gauge group is present. In that case

\mathfrak{L}= -\frac{1}{4} \kappa F_{\mu\nu}^A F^{B,\mu\nu} \hspace{1cm} A\neq B

are allowed for field strength tensorsFμ**ν of two different Abelian groupsA,B .κ is in general an × n matrix ifn Abelian groups are present. SARAH fully includes the effect of kinetic mixing independent of the number of Abelian groups. For this purpose SARAH is not working with field strength interactions like eq. ([eq:off]) but performs a rotation to bring the field strength in a diagonal form. That’s done by a redefinition of the vectorΥ carrying all gauge fieldsVXμ:

\Upsilon \to \sqrt{\kappa} \Upsilon

This rotation has an impact on the interactions of the gauge bosons with matter fields. In general, the interaction of a particleϕ with all gauge fields can be expressed by

ΘϕTG̃**Υ

Θϕ is a vector containing the chargesQϕx ofϕ under allU(1) groupsx andG̃ is an × n diagonal matrix carrying the gauge couplings of the different groups. After the rotation according to eq. ([eq:kappaRot]) the interaction part can be expressed by

ΘϕTG**Υ

with a generaln × n matrixG which is no longer diagonal. In that way, the effect of gauge kinetic mixing has been absorbed in ’off-diagonal’ gauge couplings. That means the covariant derivative in SARAH reads

D_\mu \phi = \left(\partial_\mu - i \sum_{x,y} Q_\phi^x g_{xy} V^\mu_y \right)\phi \hspace{1cm}

x, y are running over allU(1) groups, andgx**y are the entries of the matrixG. Gauge-kinetic mixing is not only included in the interactions with vector bosons, but also in the derivation of theD-terms. Therefore, theD-terms for the Abelian sector in SARAH read

𝔏D, U(1) = ∑i**j(ϕi*ϕi)(GTΘϕi)(G**Θϕj)(ϕj*ϕj)

while the non-AbelianD-terms keep the standard form eq. ([eq:Dterms]). Finally, also ’off-diagonal’ gaugino masses are introduced. The soft-breaking part of the Lagrangian reads then

\mathfrak{L}_{SB,\lambda,U(1)} \supset \sum_{xy} \frac{1}{2} \lambda_x \lambda_y M_{xy} + h.c.

SARAH takes the off-diagonal gaugino masses to be symmetric Mx**y = My**x .

Gauge fixing sector

All terms written down so far lead to a Lagrangian which is invariant under a general gauge transformation. To break this invariance one can add ’gauge fixing’ terms to the Lagrangian. The general form of these terms is

\mathfrak{L}_{GF} = - \frac{1}{2} |\mathscr{F}_A^a|^2 .

Here,ℱAa is usually a function involving partial derivatives of gauge bosonsVμA, a. SARAH usesRξ gauge. That means that for an unbroken gauge symmetry, the gauge fixing terms are

\mathfrak{L}_{GF} = - \frac{1}{2 R_{\xi_A}} \left|\partial^\mu V_\mu^{A,a} \right|^2 .

For broken symmetries, the gauge fixings terms are chosen in a way that the mixing terms between vector bosons and scalars disappears from the Lagrangian. This generates usually terms of the form

\mathfrak{L}_{GF, R_\xi} = - \frac{1}{2 R_{\xi_A}} \left| \partial^\mu V^{A}_\mu + R_{\xi_{A}} M_A G^A \right|^2

Here,GA is the Goldstone boson of the vector bosonVμA with massMA. From the gauge fixing part, the interactions of ghost fieldsη̄Aa are derived by

𝔏Ghost = −η̄Aa(δℱAa).

Here,δ assigns the operator for a BRST transformation. All steps to get the gauge fixing parts and the ghost interactions are completely done automatically by SARAH and adjusted to the gauge groups in the model.

See also

Clone repository

Home

Index

  • Additional terms in Lagrangian
  • Advanced usage of FlavorKit
  • Advanced usage of FlavorKit to calculate new Wilson coefficients
  • Advanced usage of FlavorKit to define new observables
  • Already defined Operators in FlavorKit
  • Already defined observables in FlavorKit
  • Auto-generated templates for particles.m and parameters.m
  • Automatic index contraction
  • Basic definitions for a non-supersymmetric model
  • Basic definitions for a supersymmetric model
  • Basic usage of FlavorKit
  • Boundary conditions in SPheno
  • CalcHep CompHep
  • Calculation of flavour and precision observables with SPheno
  • Checking the particles and parameters within Mathematica
  • Checks of implemented models
  • Conventions
  • Decay calculation with SPheno
  • Defined FlavorKit parameters
  • Definition of the properties of different eigenstates
  • Delete Particles
  • Different sets of eigenstates
  • Diphoton and digluon vertices with SPheno
  • Dirac Spinors
  • FeynArts
  • Fine-Tuning calculations with SPheno
  • Flags for SPheno Output
  • Flags in SPheno LesHouches file
  • FlavorKit
  • FlavorKit Download and Installation
  • Flavour Decomposition
  • GUT scale condition in SPheno
  • Gauge Symmetries SUSY
  • Gauge Symmetries non-SUSY
  • Gauge fixing
  • Gauge group constants
  • General information about Field Properties
  • General information about model implementations
  • Generating files with particle properties
  • Generic RGE calculation
  • Global Symmetries SUSY
  • Global Symmetries non-SUSY
  • Handling of Tadpoles with SPheno
  • Handling of non-fundamental representations
  • HiggsBounds
  • Higher dimensionsal terms in superpotential
  • Input parameters of SPheno
  • Installation
  • Installing Vevacious
  • LHCP
  • LHPC
  • LaTeX
  • Lagrangian
  • Loop Masses
  • Loop calculations
  • Loop functions
  • Low or High scale SPheno version
  • Main Commands
  • Main Model File
  • Matching to the SM in SPheno
  • MicrOmegas
  • ModelOutput
  • Model files for Monte-Carlo tools
  • Model files for other tools
  • Models with Thresholds in SPheno
  • Models with another gauge group at the SUSY scale
  • Models with several generations of Higgs doublets
  • More precise mass spectrum calculation
  • No SPheno output possible
  • Nomenclature for fields in non-supersymmetric models
  • Nomenclature for fields in supersymmetric models
  • One-Loop Self-Energies and Tadpoles
  • One-Loop Threshold Corrections in Scalar Sectors
  • Options SUSY Models
  • Options non-SUSY Models
  • Parameters.m
  • Particle Content SUSY
  • Particle Content non-SUSY
  • Particles.m
  • Phases
  • Potential
  • Presence of super-heavy particles
  • RGE Running with Mathematica
  • RGEs
  • Renormalisation procedure of SPheno
  • Rotations angles in SPheno
  • Rotations in gauge sector
  • Rotations in matter sector
  • SARAH in a Nutshell
  • SARAH wiki
  • SLHA input for Vevacious
  • SPheno
  • SPheno Higgs production
  • SPheno Output
  • SPheno and Monte-Carlo tools
  • SPheno files
  • SPheno mass calculation
  • SPheno threshold corrections
  • Setting up SPheno.m
  • Setting up Vevacious
  • Setting up the SPheno properties
  • Special fields and parameters in SARAH
  • Superpotential
  • Support of Dirac Gauginos
  • Supported Models
  • Supported gauge sectors
  • Supported global symmetries
  • Supported matter sector
  • Supported options for symmetry breaking
  • Supported particle mixing
  • Tadpole Equations
  • The renormalisation scale in SPheno
  • Tree-level calculations
  • Tree Masses
  • Two-Loop Self-Energies and Tadpoles
  • UFO
  • Usage of tadpoles equations
  • Using SPheno for two-loop masses
  • Using auxiliary parameters in SPheno
  • VEVs
  • Vertices
  • Vevacious
  • WHIZARD